24 April 2014 00:52


News
Twitter RSS Newsletter Send to a friend
16

Univ Bristol live with System C

25 April 2012  

University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust has gone live with its Medway patient administration system and electronic patient record.

The trust was due to go live with the system over the weekend, and has confirmed to EHI that it has done so. The trust is understood to have taken large scale approach to the go-live, and to have a significant proportion of its staff live with the system already.

The trust selected System C to provide it with a new PAS and EPR in May last year, signing a seven year contract with the company.

It has also purchased Medway departmental systems for A&E, maternity and theatres, a clinical data collection module, and a data warehouse and reporting system, Medway Business Intelligence.

System C’s portal product, Medway Connect, will be used to integrate a range of third party and trust-developed applications, including Medicode and Sunquest ICE.

When the trust selected the system, Stephen Hann, clinical systems programme director for the trust, said it had chosen Medway because it was a “modern system, built specifically for the NHS” and one that would allow it to deliver a “step change” in PAS and clinical functionality for staff.

The Bristol deal was also an important win for System C, which has been awarded a similar deal by Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, which is due to go live in June.

 

EHI Intelligence Profiles
EHI Intelligence


Related Articles:

News: Bristol working on mid-April go-live | 27 March 2012
6 News: UH Bristol picks Medway for EPR | 11 May 2011
Last updated: 30 April 2012 15:25

© 2012 EHealth Media.


Follow

Wow! very wecome Friday goodwill to all...

Jon Hoeksma 103 weeks ago

Not sure if its Friday, the week of rain, something in the air at Uni Bristol but this implementation of Medway has led to an outpouring of good feelings and neighbourly warmth, admiration and harmony not always evident on the comments pages of EHI. And very welcome it is to.

So hearty congrats to Uni hospitals Bristol staff Mckesson, System C folk, fellow suppliers and all concerned or just in generous mood for giving us news story that has led to such positive feelings. Well done everyone...


Reply
Flag
 +2
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
Jon Hoeksma
Expertise:
Other professional
Sector:
NGO
Approved posts:
214
Likes:
0
My EHI score:
214
Reward badges:

Congratulations to UHB and from one supplier to another

Shane Tickell 103 weeks ago

As a CEO of an EPR solution that is also NHS ready, I want to add my compliments to UHB and the System C team. It is really good for the industry and our NHS colleagues to see success stories and on behalf of IMS MAXIMS I congratulate you all and look forward to further good news that conveys there are good applicable solutions, with good implementation capability from home grown teams and products.

My sincere best wishes to you all.


Reply
Flag
 +2
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
Shane Tickell
Expertise:
Other professional
Sector:
Industry
Approved posts:
7
Likes:
2
My EHI score:
9
Reward badges:

Another South Western RHA/Swift/EDS/HP site moves on

stan 10 103 weeks ago

As an old stager I remember the "one system, take it when you are ready" strategy of the old South Western RHA and regional computer centre. The main plus was the shared community and joint development of requirements then in the region. With RHA changes and new policies the Regional Computer Centre and systems were bought out by EDS in the mid 1990s and the EDS was bought iteself by HP. The community facilitated by the South West RHA (merger of South Western and Wessex) were close to a reprocurement through the Shires consortium which was then blown out of the water at final business case stage by the emergence of NPfIT. So telling now to see a number of different strategic systems deployed in the patch:

Cerner: Weston, Taunton, North Bristol

System C: UHB, Royal Devon & Exeter

iSoft/CSC: Plymouth

It will be interesting to see whether Yeovil currently out to tender links with one of these groups or extends the mix further.

And as far as I know North Devon, South Devon and Royal Cornwall still have core systems from HP.

So overall a patch demonstrating a move from "standardisation" (RHA and NPfIT) to Competitive Marketplace over a generation.


Reply
Flag
 +2
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
stan 10
Expertise:
IT professional
Sector:
Public sector
Approved posts:
53
Likes:
0
My EHI score:
53
Reward badges:

Congratulations to the Uhbristol team!

Neo 103 weeks ago

It's a rare (possibly unheard of) thing to see one of these implementations delivered to quite the standard that seems to have been achieved at UHBristol.

The lessons learned from Bristol should make interesting reading indeed. Whilst the apparent success of this delivery is to be applauded, we still need to learn about the areas that could have been improved...sharing is caring!


Reply
Flag
 +2
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
Neo
Expertise:
Other professional
Sector:
Other
Approved posts:
6
Likes:
1
My EHI score:
7
Reward badges:

Thumbs up from a clinician

jshaw 103 weeks ago

I am an A&E doctor working at UHB and also worked at North Bristol during the Cerner go live.

Its early days but I have to say that I have been extremely impressed with the Medway roll-out at UHB. The hospital implementation team were extremely well prepared after months of planning, countless dress rehearsals and worked hard to ensure clinical staff were trained. The data migration process must have been an epic task and the result was pretty smooth considering.

Medway itself seems to be a nice system with a modern, intuitive UI and easier to use than Cerner. Adoption of EMRs is going to be challenging amongst clinicians as it undoubtedly slows down a clinician's ability to deliver care but I firmly believe this is outweighed by the long term benefits of providing better, safer and data driven care.


Reply
Flag
 +3
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
jshaw
Expertise:
Clinician
Sector:
Public sector
Approved posts:
4
Likes:
3
My EHI score:
7
Reward badges:

Vendor Neutral Clinical Portal--XDS consumer

Neelam Dugar 103 weeks ago

connectathon-results.ihe.net/view_result.php?rows=company&columns=actor&title=integration_profile

Approximately 70-100 vendors have tested for XDS consumer compliance in IHE global connectathons. NHS customers need to demand for vendor neutrality. Vendor commercial interests currently are NOT with unlocked vendor neutral data. But the market will mature. When they are unable to sell products unless XDS/XDR compliant (this was how DICOM came about--initially there was scaremongering, then provided at a cost, and then was part of solution as customers would not buy non-DICOM products.

I remain positive & optimistic for NHS.


Reply
Flag
 +1
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
Neelam Dugar
Expertise:
Clinician
Sector:
Public sector
Approved posts:
241
Likes:
0
My EHI score:
241
Reward badges:

Stephen Hann

Lyn from eHealth Insider 103 weeks ago

Since posting this story, eHealth Insider has been informed that Stephen Hann passed away last year.

A reader involved in the Bristol project described Steve as "a great bloke" with a "can-do attitude" that set the tone for its success. They also said his death was "a great tragedy for his family and for everyone that worked with and knew him."


Reply
2 Replies
Flag
 +1
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
Top 10
Lyn from eHealth Insider
Expertise:
Other professional
Sector:
Media
Approved posts:
143
Likes:
0
My EHI score:
143
Reward badges:

Stephen Hann

PeteMarsh 103 weeks ago

I too want to add my celebration of Steve's life and abilities. I worked on the Wirral vision with Steve at Cerner for a long time and the coexistence strategy with the legacy Wirral PCIS EPR was borne out of a lot of time spent in "smoke filled rooms" (well not really but sounds like what it felt like). Later when he eventually ended up in Bristol, I was about to visit after his surgery and got the rather sudden bad news, that we had lost a very capable Clinical IT guy with vision. As a person he was top notch and wonderful to enjoy a pint with after the long days of design work. My thoughts to his family and friends. Pete


Reply
Flag
 
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
PeteMarsh
Expertise:
IT professional
Sector:
Industry
Approved posts:
36
Likes:
0
My EHI score:
36
Reward badges:

Stephen Hann

sdeviney 103 weeks ago

Stephen was indeed a wonderful man, whose passing on December 5 was a great loss. I hired him sight-unseen in 2001 based on nothing more than a phone call with him. Many congratulations to the team at UH Bristol. Your work is a fitting tribute to Stephen's vision and commitment to ensuring the best possible care using information technology as an enabling tool. Thank you!


Reply
Flag
 +2
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
sdeviney
Expertise:
0
Sector:
0
Approved posts:
1
Likes:
2
My EHI score:
3
Reward badges:

Well done the "Brizzle Team"

John Aird 103 weeks ago

Good supplier, good products, good trust, excellent team = good outcome.


Reply
Flag
 +2
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
Top 20
John Aird
Expertise:
IT professional
Sector:
Public sector
Approved posts:
90
Likes:
0
My EHI score:
90
Reward badges:

Congratulations

HealthITSlave 103 weeks ago

Congratulations and well done to UHB and System C. Looking forward to hearing how it has gone and if you have any lessons learned for the rest of us out there.


Reply
Flag
 +2
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
HealthITSlave
Expertise:
Clinician
Sector:
Industry
Approved posts:
5
Likes:
1
My EHI score:
6
Reward badges:

Exit Strategy & Vendor Neutral Clinical Portal

Neelam Dugar 103 weeks ago

I hope they have agreed an exit strategy.

I hope they have insisted their clinical portal is vendor neutral (XDS consumer compliant).

Otherwise, 7 years later they will have trouble.


Reply
1 Reply
Flag
 +1
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
Neelam Dugar
Expertise:
Clinician
Sector:
Public sector
Approved posts:
241
Likes:
0
My EHI score:
241
Reward badges:

Plea from the well of ignorance

mrtablet 103 weeks ago

Neelam

I think most EHI readers are aware of and acknowledge achievements in the exchange of pictures (e.g. radiology images) between systems from different vendors. This is a hard won intellectual and logistic triumph - in essence the transfer of image files plus thin and readily converged metadata with shared and highly constrained uses for the data at either end of the exchange.

However many EHI readers work in areas such as enterprise scheduling, clinical coding, order communications, LIMS, care pathway management, decision support, medicines management, clinical performance and patient outcomes reporting etc.

The data underlying these might be packaged within XDS - but this isn't the transmission of 'blobs'. Within the XDS wrapper remain the persistent issues of divergent data models, coding systems, uses cases, data standards, terminology bindings, version control etc.

So can you please remind us which secondary care systems available in the UK market seamlessly exchange generic machine readable electronic records containing these kinds of data with systems from other vendors.

Caveat - no acronyms, connectathon demos, marketing puff, promising academic research etc: just the names of two EHR suppliers operating in the UK who can deploy hospital systems NOW which fit these criteria.

Thank you.

Otherwise "XDS consumer compliance" helps less than the universal vendor assurance "we can dump delimited text files from our database tables"


Reply
1 Reply
Flag
 +2
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
Top 10
mrtablet
Expertise:
IT professional
Sector:
Industry
Approved posts:
366
Likes:
0
My EHI score:
366
Reward badges:

My thoughts too, largely

AdeByrne 103 weeks ago

The good news is that system C products are largely modular, meaning it is possible to migrate into and away from them incrementally. I think that is the case anyway, as they will co-exist with other OCS for example.

The big problems on exit come with all in one big bang projects. Both will ultimately need similar solutions for exit and these should use the available standards. Talking with VNA vendors right now about EPR however yields nothing more than a conversation about the art of the possible.

What trusts should start to think about though is where is the data in the new system, do they own it, and can they get enough of it into an independent place whereby they can a)use it operationally for other purposes and b)roll on past the end of contract without needing any [or much] of the data that was in the "black box". Think about what the system needs to run itself versus what you might need out of it in terms of a patient and audit record. For now this second set could be replicated into a clinical data repository. None of this will be easy of course and I agree that at the moment it is somewhat fanciful.


Flag
 +3
Like

This comment is:

Email address:

Submit

Follow

Post

 
Top 10
AdeByrne
Expertise:
IT professional
Sector:
Public sector
Approved posts:
106
Likes:
1
My EHI score:
107
Reward badges:
 
[1] 2

EHealth Media Limited
EHealth Insider is managed and maintained by EHealth Media © 2014
Registered Office: 11 Campana Road, London SW6 4AS
Registered No. 4214439 | Vat No. 774 4008 29
About us | Advertise | Terms and conditions | Privacy policy | Cookie policy | Contact us